PENGGUNAAN BEKISTING BONDEK UNTUK PERCEPATAN WAKTU PROYEK BANGUNAN BERTINGKAT 26 LANTAI

  • Rachmi Yanita Institut Teknologi Indonesia
  • Terry Novi AR Institut Teknologi Indonesia

Abstract

 

Abstract

Conventional formwork using multiplex material and bondek formwork are types of formwork that have their respective advantages. The choice of formwork type is determined by the project constraints of each project. For time and cost optimization, value engineering was carried out between the two formwork methods in planning the construction of the 26-storey Urban Height Residences Apartment Project with a floor area of ​​10,000 m2 in South Tangerang. Implementation of typical slab and beam structure work, divided into 2 work zones for work effectiveness. In conventional formwork, the need for formwork material is based on the cycle of formwork transfer between zones and between floors, so it is sufficient to use formwork with an area of ​​4 floors and above is carried out with conventional formwork and bonded formwork. In the time analysis, an analysis of the time requirements is made for the process of installing, dismantling and removing formwork. From the results of the analysis obtained that the conventional formwork multiplex (plywood) requires a cost of Rp. 2,168,573,650,- for a typical floor area of ​​35,974.75 m2, or Rp. 60,280,-/m2 which is 64.36% more effective than using bondek formwork. In terms of time, conventional multiplex (plywood) formwork takes 250 days to work, with a daily productivity of 143,899 m2/day, 20% longer than bondek formwork. The type of formwork used in the design stage must be in accordance with the project constraints so as to produce an optimal design.

 

Keywords: Conventional Formwork, Bondek Formwork, Project Constraint.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. A.D, Austen dan R.H. Neale. 1991. Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi. Jakarta : PPM.
2. Amin Zainullah. 2018. Syarat yang Harus Dipenuhi dalam Pembuatan Bekisting Agar Konstruksi Beton Mencapai Hasil Maksimal. Jago Bangunan.com, (Diakses Desember 2020)
3. Arija, Whifaq Fatha. 2017. Evaluasi Perbandingan Bekisting Perancah Konvensional dan Bekisting Perancah Table Form Menggunakan Sistem Zoning. Repository Skripsi. Jember: Jurusan S1 Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Sipil. Universitas Negri Jember.
4. Dimyati, H., & Nurjaman, K. 2014. Manajemen Proyek. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
5. Gnetindonesia.com. 2018. Kelebihan dan Kekurangan Floordeck/Bondek, GNET Building Solutions. (Diakses Desember 2020.
6. Ibad, M Husnil, 2016. Alternatif Pemasangan Bekisting Balok dan Plat Pada Proyek Jember Icon dengan metode Zonasi. Repository/ Tidak Diterbitkan. Skripsi.Jember: Jurusan D3 Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Sipil Universitas Negri Jember.
7. Ibrahim, H. Bachtiar. 1993. Rencana Dan Estimate Real Of Cost.Cetakan ke-2. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
8. Saraswati, Yevi Novi Dwi. 2012. Analisa Perbandingan Penggunaan Bekisting Semi Konvensional dengan Bekisting system table form pada konstruksi gedung Bertingkat. Skripsi. Surabaya :Jurusan Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Sipil, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November.
9. SNI 7394-2008. 2008. Tata Cara Perhitungan Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Beton Untuk Konstruksi Bangunan Gedung Dan Perumahan.
10. Soeharto I. 1995, Manajemen Proyek Dari Konseptual Sampai Operasional. Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta .
11. Wigbout, F. Ing. 1992. Bekisting (KotakCetak). Jakarta :Penerbit Erlangga
12. Yanita, Rachmi , Intan F. Ningrum, Krishna Mochtar. 2020. Manfaat Penerapan Metode AON (Activity On Node) untuk Penjadwalan Proyek Bangunan Bertingkat Tinggi. Jurnal IPTEK, Volume 4, No. 2, Agustus 2020: 48-55.
Published
2022-06-30
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Abstract views: 83
downloads: 48