PERBEDAAN PERSEPSI MAHASISWA TERHADAP EFEKTIVITAS LINGKUNGAN PEMBELAJARAN ONLINE DAN OFFLINE: KAJIAN FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS ABDURRAB
Abstract
Background: Covid 19 made the learning system that was originally carried out offline forced to be switched to learning with the online method. This change can affect the perception of students which will later affect the effectiveness of learning. This research was conducted with the hope that it can be an evaluation material in the application of online learning at the Faculty of Medicine, Abdurrab University. Objective: To find out the differences in students' perceptions of the effectiveness of online and offline learning environments in Abdurrab University School of Medicine students. Method: This study used design with a cross-sectional research design. The sampling technique was carried out by stratified random sampling on 147 students of the academic stage of the Abdurrab University Faculty of Medicine. The instrument used was a DREEM (Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure) questionnaire consisting of 50 questions that were analyzed using paired t-test. Results: There is a significant difference (p-value 0.031) between the perception of the online learning environment and the offline at the Abdurrab University School of Medicine. Conclusion: The perception of students at abdurrab University's Faculty of Medicine shows that the offline learning environment is more effective than online learning in terms of the learning process and lecturers. Meanwhile, the online learning environment is more effective than offline learning in terms of learning atmosphere, academic achievement, and social environment.
References
[2] A. Muliadi, B. Mirawati, and H. Jannah, “Efektivitas Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 : Persepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 626–633, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JISIP/index.
[3] H. Algahtani, B. Shirah, A. Subahi, A. Aldarmahi, S. N. Ahmed, and M. A. Khan, “Perception of Students about E-learning : A Single-center Experience from Saudi Arabia,” vol. 2, pp. 65–71, 2020.
[4] L. Hakim, Anisah, and A. Kekalih, “hubungan antara persepsi mahasiswa fakultas kedokteran universitas pembangunan nasional ‘veteran’ Jakarta terhadap lingkungan pembelajaran dan prestasi akademik.” Perhimpunan Pengkaji Ilmu Pendidikan kedokteran Indonesia (PERPIPKI), 2016.
[5] B. Prasetyo and L. M. Jannah, Metodologi Penelitian Kuanttatif. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada, 2009.
[6] N. N. A. Shafira, A. Jusuf, and S. Budiningsih, “Strategi Pembelajaran Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Dokter Universitas Jambi,” J. Pendidik. Kedokt. Indones., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–37, 2014.
[7] R. R. Akbar, “Hubungan Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Lingkungan Pembelajaran dan Hubungan Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Lingkungan Pembelajaran dan Tingkat Stres,” J. Kedokt. Baiturrahmah, no. Januari-Juni 2018, pp. 47–53, 2019.
[8] W. Anwar and J. H. J. Wahid, “Learners ’ Perception On Online Learning Implementation During Covid-19 Pandemic,” vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 126–138, 2021.
[9] R. Lisiswanti, “Peranan Dosen Pendidikan Kedokteran : dari perspektif ilmu pendidikan kedokteran,” J. Kedokt. Unila, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 186–190, 2019.
[10] M. Valizadeh, “Cheating In Online Learning Programs : Learners ’ Perceptions And Solutions,” Turkish Online J. Distance Educ., no. January, 2022, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1050394.
[11] W. Kusumawati, T. S. Prihatiningsih, G. R. Rahayu, and S. Sastrowijoto, “Medical Students ’ Reflection On Cheating , Altruism And Plagiarism : A Qualitative Study,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2018.
[12] A. Soekanto, E. Devi, and D. Rianti, “Analisis Tingkat Kelelahan Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran Daring di Era Pandemik Covid-19 Tahun Ajaran 2020 / 2021 Analysis of Student Fatigue Levels in Online Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic for the 2020 / 2021 Academic Year,” vol. 2071, no. September, pp. 154–165, 2021.
[13] L. N. Wahyuni, “Hubungan Antara Dukungan Sosial Teman Dengan Problem Focused Coping Pada Mahasiswa Kedokteran Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Unissula) Semarang Skripsi,” 2018.
[14] R. R. Callister and M. S. Love, “A Comparison of Learning Outcomes in Skills-Based Courses: Online Versus Face-To-Face Formats,” J. Innov. Educ., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 243–256, 2016, doi: 10.1111/dsji.12093.
[15] Nurlatifah, E. Ahman, and A. Machmud, “Efektivitas pembelajaran online dan tatap muka,” Pedago. J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 5, pp. 15–17, 2021, [Online]. Available: Efektivitas; Pembelajaran Online; Pembelajaran Tatap Muka.
[16] S. Ningsih, “Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Daring Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” JINOTEP (Jurnal Inov. dan Teknol. Pembelajaran) Kaji. dan Ris. Dalam Teknol. Pembelajaran, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 124–132, 2020, doi: 10.17977/um031v7i22020p124.
[17] S. Kumari, H. Gautam, N. Nityadarshini, and B. K. Das, “Online classes versus traditional?Comparison during COVID‑19,” J. Educ. Health Promot., pp. 1–4, 2021, doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp.
[18] T. Nguyen, “The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons,” MERLOT J. Online Learn. Teach., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 2015.
Copyright (c) 2023 Collaborative Medical Journal (CMJ)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyright of all journal manuscripts is held by the Collaborative Medical Journal (CMJ)
2. Formal legal provisions to access digital articles of electronic journal are subject to the provision of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license (CC BY-NC-SA), which means that Collaborative Medical Journal (CMJ) is rightful to keep, transfer media/format, manage in the form of databases, maintain, and publish articles.
3. Published manuscripts both printed and electronic are open access for educational, research, and library purposes. Additionally, the editorial board is not responsible for any violations of copyright law.
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.