EVALUASI PERATURAN DAERAH KABUPATEN SIDOARJO NOMOR 3 TAHUN 2016

Abstract

The Sidoarjo Regency Government created Sidoarjo Regency PERDA Number 3 of 2016 concerning the Arrangement and Empowerment of Street Vendors as a response to the proliferation of street vendors. One of the street vendors that is of concern is Gading Fajar street vendors, numbering 1,200 street vendors. This research aims to determine the evaluation of Sidoarjo Regency PERDA Number 3 of 2016 using a qualitative case study method written descriptively. This PERDA evaluation uses the theory of William N. Dunn (2003) which has six criteria, namely effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, alignment, responsiveness and accuracy. The research results show that based on effectiveness criteria, PERDA is still not effective because the achievement of objectives and involvement of the authorities has not been optimal. However, there is effectiveness in monitoring the arrangement of street vendors by the Sidoarjo Regency Satpol PP. From the efficiency criteria, it shows that the arrangement of street vendors is efficient in terms of time and resources, but not yet efficient in terms of costs. From the adequacy criteria, it shows that the PERDA is not sufficient as a guideline for structuring and empowering street vendors because the Sidoarjo Regency Cooperatives and Micro Enterprises Service has not implemented it optimally so that the Sidoarjo Regency Satpol PP is more dominant in enforcing it themselves. From the leveling criteria, it shows that the distribution of facilities and infrastructure and the distribution of costs is still not evenly distributed, but there is some leveling in socialization by the Sidoarjo Regency Satpol PP. From the responsiveness criteria, it shows that the Sidoarjo Regency Cooperatives and Micro Enterprises Service and the Sidoarjo Regency Satpol PP received various responses of acceptance and rejection but they were able to overcome them and Gading Fajar Street Vendors continue to wait for empowerment from the authorities. From the accuracy criteria, it shows that the accuracy of objectives and benefits are still not balanced because its implementation in Gading Fajar is still focused on structuring and has not yet led to empowerment.